Welcome back my friends, to the show that never ends…..Yes, every Friday we at Anandamide scour our inbox for the best in rock n’ roll beefcake.
Today we continue our series on entries that were disqualified from the great homoerotic photo contest. Last week’s entry from Coaster Punchman was disqualified for breaking the rule that the entrant had to be classic rock. This week’s photo didn’t miss out because of a blatant rule violation, but more for violating the spirit of the contest. In many ways, the photo below is similar to one of our strongest entries (this one of Rod Stewart): long hair, plenty of exposed man-flesh and a skimpy bikini that fails to cover the rocker’s pubic region (who can resist male pubic hair !!!! so hot !!!!). The critical difference is the attitude. With the Rod Stewart photo, you just know Rod is desperately trying to be sexy and believing that he’s doing the ladies of the world a favor by barely covering his schlong and exposing the beard in his pants (“a little glimpse of heaven, luv”). It’s that attitude that makes the photo funny, in my opinion.
Contrast that with this photo submitted by Captain Smack. The skimpy bikini is there, the pubis, and plenty of ferns to boot. But it’s my judgment that the intention here is to be weird and disturbing, rather than sexy. But I will let you, the reader decide. Ladies and gentlemen, Frank Zappa:
“For some reason, the children didn’t trust the curator at the botanical museum”

Handsome!
Frank Zappa called in re: your post. His message was:
You’re an asshole, you’re an asshole (yes yes!)
You’re an asshole, you’re an asshole (that’s right!)
Damn I miss that album;)
I love Frank Zappa and his sense of humor! This picture makes me smile.
I love the socks!
I think it was the socks that did him in.
Definitely not sexy. But, strangely, not that disturbing.
I just.
I just don’t know what to say.
He needed to go on What Not to Wear.
I DO believe that Disturbing might have been the idea.. Ya think???